|
||||||
|
Home | International
Feldenkrais Federation | Scientific Research | Information |
||||||
ISSN
1817-4000 |
||||||
![]() |
Future Directions for Research on the Feldenkrais Method | |||||
INTRODUCTION As we go into the future, we will be competing with other health care professions who are increasingly evidence based and increasingly effective in what they do. We must continue to do research on Feldenkrais Method so that people understand its effectiveness and so that we ourselves better understand the tools that we are working with and continuing to develop. Research can become/ is becoming part of the conversation about how we use and develop the Feldenkrais Method (FM). Research operates on several levels. Because we are interested in the manner and extent to which FM can impact people to improve their function, research should be directed toward the assessment of functional outcomes associated with participation in Awareness Through Movement (ATM) and Functional Integration (FI). This has been a primary area of interest and research up to this point both for practitioners, researchers and people looking at FM from the outside. After a functional outcome has been demonstrated in some area (Established Outcomes), we can begin to ask research questions about how this happens. This process is the investigation of mechanisms (Mechanisms) and is a much harder question as it involves multiple possibilities all of which may not be known or understood and a more abstract level of function. Only a small amount of research has been done in this area. A third level of research directly addresses theories (Theory), which are developed out of the relationships /between what we do and the physical, physiological, psychological and social laws that govern the behavior of entities in the world. Although the outcomes of FM work depend on these relationships, very little of our research has ventured in this direction. Future research should be based in and developed out of past research and established theory. In this paper, my purpose is to take a broad view of possible research questions and not limit the discussion to one or another particular area. I will reprint paper titles in bibliography form and where possible abstracts of published research to give a vibrant sense of the research that has been done. The research will be grouped into several different areas for convenience of discussion. Each area will be approached as suggested above by first addressing functional outcomes, then mechanisms and finally theory. The references (abstracts) following each section are in rough alphabetical order within that section. I. Low Back Pain and Chronic Pain Outcomes: This is the area where most research has been done on FM.
There are many case reports and small studies all suggesting that FM
can be effective in dealing with pain. In spite of this, Maher (7)
wrote in 2004 that FM is of unknown value or ineffective and should
not be considered for interventions in chronic pain. As practitioners,
we know that this is not the case. More research needs to be done to
make this clear to other health care professionals. There are several
problems with the research that has been done to this point. Studies
have been done without control groups (1, 11), or with a small number
of subjects or single cases being reported (2, 9, 13). Smith (12) reported
no reduction of pain but used only a single 30- minute lesson as an
intervention. It is unrealistic to expect that this short an intervention
would significantly impact chronic pain. Yet this literature remains
unanswered. Mechanisms: What are the underlying processes through which FM might
be working to reduce pain? 1) Perhaps there is reduced inappropriate
effort or muscle tone (parasitic activity) that could lead to reduction
in pain. This has been suggested by Kegerris et al (39, 40) in work
with people without chronic pain. This idea could be studied directly
with people who do present with chronic pain using emg assessment of
muscle activity or some similar technology. 2) Perhaps there is reorganization
of movement patterns that reduce stresses. This might show up as changes
in biomechanical organization of movements using motion analysis before
and after a series of lessons and might also be reflected in changes
in emg activity. 3) Perhaps there are physiological changes such as
increase in endorphins or a change in the balance or autonomic nervous
system (ANS) activity away from greater sympathetic toward greater
para-sympathetic activity affecting the perception of pain. Changes
like this have been suggested by Kolt et al (11, 37). ANS function
and endorphin levels could be measured directly and correlated with
ATM or FI lessons in properly controlled studies. 1. Alexander A. Perceived
pain and disability decreases after Feldenkrais’ Awareness
Through Movement. Masters Thesis. Cal State, Northridge, June 2006. 2. Bearman D, Shafarman S. Feldenkrais
Method in the Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Study of Efficacy and
Cost Effectiveness. Am. J. Pain
Management. 9 (1): 22-27, 1999. 3. Dean JR, Yuen SA, and Barrows SA. Effects
of A Feldenkrais Awareness Through Movement Sequence on Fibromyalgia
Patients. A study reported
to the CA-PTA in 1997 also presented at the NA Feldenkrais Guild Conference
in August, 1997. 4. Kendall SA. Ekselius L. Gerdle B. Soren B. Bengtsson A. Feldenkrais
intervention in fibromyalgia patients: a pilot study. J Musculoskeletal
Pain. 9(4):25-35, 2001. 5. Lundblad I. Elert J. Gerdle B. Randomized
controlled trial of physiotherapy and Feldenkrais interventions in
female workers with neck-shoulder
complaints. [Journal Article, Clinical Trial] Journal
of Occupational Rehabilitation. 1999 Sep; 9(3): 179-94. (46 ref) 6. Maher CG. Effective physical treatment
for chronic low back pain. [Review] [52 refs] [Journal Article. Review. Review, Tutorial] Orthopedic
Clinics of North America. 35(1):57-64, 2004 Jan. 7. Malmgren-Olsson E. Armelius B. Armelius K. A
comparative outcome study of body awareness therapy, Feldenkrais
, and conventional physiotherapy
for patients with nonspecific musculoskeletal disorders: changes in
psychological symptoms, pain, and self-image. [Journal Article, Research,
Tables/Charts] Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 2001 Jun; 17(2):
77-95. (55 ref) 8. Narula M, Jackson O, Kulig K. The Effects of Six Week Feldenkrais Method on Selected Functional Parameters in a Subject with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Physical Therapy 72: (suppl.) S86,1992 9. O'Connor M. Webb R. Learning to
rest when in pain. [Journal Article,
Pictorial, Research] European Journal of Palliative Care. 2002 Mar-Apr;
9(2): 68-71. (18 ref) 10. Phipps A, Lopez R, Powell R (advisor), Lundy-Ekman L (advisor), Maebori D (CFP). A Functional Outcome Study on the Use of Movement Re-Education in Chronic Pain Management. Master’s Thesis at Pacific University, School of Physical Therapy, Forest Grove, Oregon, May 1997. 11. Smith AL. Kolt GS. McConville JC. The
effect of the Feldenkrais method on pain and anxiety in people experiencing
chronic low back
pain. [Journal Article, Research, Tables/Charts] New Zealand Journal
of Physiotherapy. 2001 Mar; 29(1): 6-14. (54 ref) 12. Stephens J. Feldenkrais method:
background, research, and orthopaedic case studies. [Journal Article, Case Study, Tables/Charts] Orthopaedic
Physical Therapy Clinics of North America. 2000 Sep; 9(3): 375-94.
(46 ref) II. Outcomes for people with neurological pathologies: CVA (stroke), traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s, spinal cord injury, and other. Outcomes: Initial work in this area was more qualitative and descriptive suggesting improvements in function and quality of life using either small, uncontrolled studies or case studies. (16, 15, 17, 18 19, 23, 24, 25, 49) The next step has begun to be taken by identifying specific outcome variables and assessing how they are affected within group over time or compared to a control group. These studies have used well accepted and validated outcome measures to document improvements in balance and mobility (13, 21, 22) and quality of life (21). More work remains to be done with all the different populations and pathologies to understand if there are groups or individuals who are more or less responsive to FM. Mechanisms: Several approaches have been made to the question of how these changes may be affected. Many neurologically based pathologies leave people with impaired sensory processes and incomplete body images. Connors (14) has begun to address the question of whether FM is useful in the process of trying to recover body image and has found some initial encouraging results. Similar results were also reported for one person in the group studied by Batson (13). Johnson reported decreased perceived stress in her work with people with multiple sclerosis (20). Many questions remain to be addressed. Is it possible to establish sensory function following a neurological lesion using FM? What is the role of sensory and perceptual function in recovery of function? How is motor imagery changed by neurological lesions? Is it possible to recover the ability for motor imagery using FM? What is the relationship between motor imagery ability and recovery of function? Some of these questions about motor imagery have begun to be studied by Batson (not yet published) but much more remains to be done. If FM can impact the ability for motor imagery, can the rate and extent of recovery of function be improved in this way? If motor imagery is improved, is there carryover to differentiation of movements that had been lost in the stroke or brain injury? Differentiation of movement can be easily assessed using a format such as the Motor Assessment Scale, the Wolf Motor Function test, or video motion analysis. Theory: One of the theoretical issues being addressed by the above works has to do with questions about how body image (self image) is constructed and the relationships between body image and action/function. In using the name Awareness Through Movement to describe one of his methods of working, Feldenkrais suggested that movement has primacy in developing awareness and hence has an important role in construction of body image. An important question related to this idea is whether, in rehabilitation (or in development), movement would be an effective strategy for recovering sensory and perceptual functions of whether they can be recovered optimally through direct sensory experience only. Another issue of interest raised by Stephens (21) and possibly peculiar to FM is that in a complex intervention like ATM that can be addressed to many people at the same time, that individuals may have very different responses and improve in different ways through the same lesson. Thus to look for everyone to respond in the same way is to miss much of what is going on. It would be interesting to see this point confirmed by other research and it is important to keep this in mind when designing research and analyzing data. 13. Batson G and Deutsch JE. Effects
of Feldenkrais Awareness Through Movement on Balance in Adults With
Chronic Neurological Deficits Following
Stroke: A Preliminary Study. Complementary Health Practice Review,
Vol. 10 No. 3, October 2005 203-210 14. Connors K and Grenough P. Redevelopment of the Sense of Self following Stroke, using the Feldenkrais Method. Poster presented at the Feldenkrais Annual Research Forum, Seattle WA, August, 2004. 15. Gilman M, Yaruss JS. Stuttering and relaxation: applications for somatic education in stuttering treatment. J Fluency Disorders. 25(1): 59-76, 2000 16. Ginsburg C. The Shake-a-Leg Body Awareness Training Program: Dealing with Spinal Injury and Recovery in a New Setting. Somatics. Spring/Summer, 1986 pp31-42. 17. Goldman Schuyler, Kathryn.
A Systems Approach to Learning and Change: Cindy’s Story. Somatics
14(3): 14-23, Fall/Winter 2003-2004 18. Ofir R. A heuristic investigation of the process of motor learning using Feldenkrais method in physical rehabilitation of two young women with traumatic brain injury. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Union Institute, NY, 1993. Brief abstract only. Documents improvements with Feldenkrais intervention. Videotape supports text 19. Bost H, Burges S, Russell R, Ruttinger H, Schlafke U. Feldstudie zur Wirksamkeit der Feldenkrais-Methode bei MS - betroffenen. Deutsche Multiple Sklerose Gesellschaft. Saarbrucken, Germany. 1994. (Summary available in English translated by Hans Hartmann, Sc.D.) 20. Johnson SK, Frederick J, Kaufman M, Mountjoy B. A controlled investigation of bodywork in multiple sclerosis. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 5(3): 237-43, 1999. Results show lower perceived stress after Feldenkrais sessions compared to a sham intervention control group. 21. Stephens J. Call S. Evans K. Glass M. Gould C. Lowe J. Responses
to ten Feldenkrais Awareness Through Movement lessons by four women
with multiple sclerosis: improved quality of life. [Journal Article,
Research, Tables/Charts] Physical Therapy Case Reports. 1999 Mar; 2(2):
58-69. (43 ref) 22. Stephens J. DuShuttle D. Hatcher C. Shmunes J. Slaninka C. Use
of awareness through movement improves balance and balance confidence
in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled study. [Journal
Article, Clinical Trial, Research, Tables/Charts] Neurology Report.
2001 Jun; 25(2): 39-49. (33 ref) 23. Shenkman M, Donovan J, Tsubota J, Kluss M, Stebbins P, Butler R. Management of Individuals with Parkinsons Disease: Rationale and Case Studies. Physical Therapy 69: 944-955, 1989 Mentions Feldenkrais Method as treatment option 24. Shelhav-Silberbush, Chava. The Feldenkrais Method for Children with Cerebral Palsy. pp116. MS Thesis. Boston University School of Education, Feldenkrais Resources, Berkeley CA,1988 25. Wendell LL. Some effects of the Feldenkrais Method on Parkinson’s symptoms and function. Unpublished case study by LL Wendell client and Marilyn Johnson, Feldenkrais Practitioner. June 2000. This is a brief, interesting, single case study documenting observations on changes in function before and after a year of Feldenkrais lessons. III. Well Elderly: mobility, balance, other. Outcomes: The first research on FM was done by Gutman in 1977, investigating the effects of ATM lessons on a group of well elderly people. This work was well conceived with the use of 2 control groups but may have been poorly executed as changes in a no activity control group were significant and masked changes seen in other groups. This work did find that FM led to improvements in perception of quality of life. Considering the research with well elderly has been so popular over the last 2 decades and that so many elderly people participate in ongoing ATM classes, it is surprising that much more research has not been done in this area. An initial report (26) demonstrated improved mobility and several subsequent reports showed significant changes in balance (28) and mobility and quality of life (29). These last 3 studies were well done including large groups, random assignment to control and intervention groups and well-validated and reliable outcome measures. More work in this area is important. Many questions remain. Can differentiation of movement and coordination be improved? Can quickness, speed and efficiency of movement be improved? Is ATM or FI or some combination a better way to improve function in elderly people? Is there an optimal way of producing changes: Weekly or more frequent lessons vs. short (half day) to moderately long (3-5 days) workshops. Does improvement of function in this way affect longevity? Does exposure to FM (over what period of time) affect an individual’s functional intelligence, problem solving ability, social activity or other psychological functions? Also the organization of an activity like walking can be investigated using non-linear dynamic methods to describe step-to-step variability. (see Stergiou et. al. 50-53) Mechanisms: Some of the same questions come up again as with neurological pathology. Sensory capacity is known to decline with age. Is it possible to alter this trend and is improved motor and sensory function then capable of altering the aging process? Theory: A theoretical issue in this area has to do with learning. Feldenkrais subtitled his book The Potent Self, learning to learn. Is it possible to rekindle the learning mechanism of the young in the elderly? Another issue based in Dynamic Systems Theory relates to the dynamics and stability of attractors. Is it possible to develop new attractors? Can these processes be qualitatively and quantitatively described and mapped across time? 26. Bennett JL, Brown BJ, Finney SA, and Sarantakis CP. Effects of a Feldenkrais Based Mobility Program on Function of a Healthy Elderly Sample. Abstract Issues on Aging 21(1):27, 1998, publication of Geriatric section of APTA. Poster presented at CSM in Boston in February 1998. 27. Gutman G, Herbert C, Brown S. Feldenkrais vs Conventional Exercise for the Elderly. J Gerontology 32(5): 562-572, 1977 Design problem control group which did nothing improved as much as the Feldenkrais group. Does suggest improved preception of quality of life in Feldenkrais group 28. Hall SE, Criddle A, Ring A, Bladen C, Tapper J, Yin R, Cosgrove A, Hu Yu-Li. Study of the effects of various forms of exercise on balance in older women. Unpublished Manuscript Healthway Starter Grant, File #7672, Dept of Rehabilitation, Sir Charles Gardner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, 1999. Shows improvements in balance and function from Tai Chi and ATM compared to a control group. Good study! 29. Stephens JL, Pendergast
C, Roller BA, Weiskittel RS. Learning to Improve Mobility
and Quality of Life in a Well Elderly
Population:
The Benefits of Awareness Through Movement. International Feldenkrais
Federation (IFF), IFF Online Research Journal, <www.feldenkrais-method.org/iff/academy/journal/index.htm>,
November 2005. IV. Cardiopulmonary Function. Outcomes: An area that is often ignored in rehabilitation is cardiopulmonary function. Saraswati (32) did ground breaking work in this area showing some improvements in breathing mechanics and air movement in 1989. This was followed up much later with qualitative work by Brand (30) who suggested improvements in the process of cardiac rehabilitation following myocardial infarct using FM techniques. A follow-up, controlled study by Lowe (31), while finding no significant quantitative differences in body perception or well being variables, did identify significantly more well being related comments by participants in the FM compared to other groups and found that those participating in FM but not progressive relaxation wanted to continue the intervention beyond the study. As in many cases the intervention by Lowe was short (several days/FI lessons) and may have been much more effective if carried out for a longer time period. Again experimenting with the length of the FM intervention is important. Long-term studies could look at questions about post MI activity levels, mortality and longevity. Some long-term assessment of post MI quality of life using SF-36 or some similar instrument would be interesting. Mechanisms: We know almost nothing in this area. The key may be related to stress and methods of breathing. Brand focused on these areas. However, physiological responses also need to be documented. What happens to blood pressure, heart rate, breathing rate, O2 saturation, healing rates? Theory: The idea of Functional Integration suggests that optimal function is achieved when all systems contributing in an integrated way being optimally responsive to the control processes on a moment to moment basis. Is cardiopulmonary function more (or optimally) responsive, or is the responsiveness of the system changed by FM work? This could be investigated using methods of non-linear dynamics to assess levels of variability in relation to normal daily activities and events that are stressful both physiologically and psychologically. (see Stergiou et al. 50-53)
31. Lowe, Bernd; Breining, Katja; Wilke, Stefanie; Wellmann, Renate;
Zipfel, Stephan; Eich, Wolfgang. Quantitative and qualitative
effects of Feldenkrais , progressive muscle relaxation, and standard
medical
treatment in patients after acute myocardial infarction. [Peer Reviewed
Journal] Psychotherapy Research. Vol 12(2) Sum 2002, 179-191. 32. Saraswati, S. Investigation of Human Postural Muscles and Respiratory Movements. M.Sc. University of New South Wales. 1989 V. Psychological functions – Imagery. Outcomes: Again, initial work in this area has been qualitative. (33, 34, 37) It has been suggested that FM improves some dimensions of body awareness. The different dimensions of body awareness (37) that are responsive remain to be elucidated. In a very well done study, Laumer (36) demonstrated a positive change in a number of important variables in a group of girls with anorexia nervosa compared to a matched control group. The outcome measures used in this study had mostly to do with body perception and satisfaction. Other variables need to be investigated. What impact is there on psychological variables such as anxiety and self-efficacy in this population? Are patterns of social interaction changed? Are problem solving skills improved in relation to management of body image issues? Mechanisms: In a 10 week study, Kerr (35) demonstrated that state anxiety was reduced in the FM group. This could help to explain the finding by Laumer noted above. Stephens (38) found positive changes in recent memory and positive social support that were highly correlated with decreased fatigue in a group of people with multiple sclerosis compared to a control group. The long-term effects of these interventions are important to study. Are positive effects still seen a month or a year later? Also it is important to evaluate the length of intervention needed to produce positive effects. If 10 ATM lessons produce a good positive effect, are 25 lessons or 50 lessons necessarily better? Are 5 lessons sufficient? Theory: Feldenkrais was interested in providing a method for people to become more adaptable to the real changes of life that occur. A question at this level is whether significant adaptive changes occur when working with FM. This is a difficult thing to document and seems necessarily qualitative in nature. An example of this type of change may be seen in Goldman-Schuyler’s Cindy’s Story.(17) It would be very interesting to approach this idea in a much more systematic way across a larger number of people exposed to some significant amount of FM. 33. Deig, Denise. Self Image in Relationship to Feldenkrais Awareness Through Movement Classes. Independent Study Project. University of Indianapolis, Krannert Graduate School of Physical Therapy, Indianapolis, Indiana. 1994 34. Hutchinson, Marcia G. TRANSFORMING BODY IMAGE. Learning to Love the Body You Have. The Crossing Press. Freedom CA 95019, 1985 Developed from doctoral dissertation: "The effect of a treatment based on the use of guided visuo-kinesthetic imagery on the alteration of negative body cathexis in women" . Boston University, 1981. 35. Kerr GA. Kotynia F. Kolt GS. FELDENKRAIS
awareness through movement and state anxiety. [Journal Article, Research, Tables/Charts] Journal
of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2002 Apr; 6(2): 102-7. (30 ref) 36. Laumer U, Bauer M, Fichter
M, Milz H. Therapeutic Effects of Feldenkrais Method “Awareness
Through Movement” in
Patients with Eating Disorders. Psychother Psychosom Med
Psychol 47(5): 170-180, 1997 (Published in German)
Full English translation available at: http://www.iffresearchjournal.org/laumereng.htm 37. Ryding C. Rudebeck CE. Mattsson B. Body
awareness in movement and language: concordance and disparity. [Journal Article, Research] Advances in Physiotherapy. 2004; 6(4): 158-65. (18 ref) 38. Stephens JL, Cates P, Jentes E, Perich A, Silverstein J, Staab
E, duShuttle D, Hatcher C, Shmunes J, Slaninka C. Awareness
Through Movement Improves Quality of Life in People with Multiple Sclerosis. J Neurol Phys Ther. 27(4): 170, 2003. Abstract, Poster presented at
APTA Combined Section Meetings, Nashville TN, February, 2004 VI. More on Mechanisms – what’s going on: Some mechanisms underlying change have been discussed already in the
preceding sections. Some research has addressed the question of mechanisms
directly. This has been done in a preliminary way at two levels in
the process of motor control: muscle activity (39, 40) and length (43)
and related changes that may be happening in the control areas in the
brain itself. Bruce (41) explored FM as a process of learning in a theoretical study. In the study of hamstring lengthening by Stephens (43), the question of learning was raised but not answered. Did the lengthening of the HS muscle being studied evolve slowly over time as might have been expected during a process of acquisition normally seen during motor learning? Many people have difficulty with the concept of learning as applied to muscle length. Demonstration of an acquisition curve and retention of the learned behavior of some reasonable period of time like a week would go a long way toward placing this phenomenon in the arena of motor learning. How many repetitions are needed for this learning to occur and over what period of time? Stephens subjects did 15 minutes of ATM daily over a period of 3 weeks. The number of repetitions varied widely from person to person. What is the minimum number, done with an effective ATM/learning approach that will produce the same or possibly a better outcome? Would 2 trials per day for a week be enough? Is there a limit to the length that can be achieved? What controls that limit? Can this same approach be applied to any muscle Group in the body by any person? How does this kind of intervention effect performance of running and jumping? Are there changes in emg activity with this process as demonstrated by Kegerris et al? 39. Brown, E and Kegerris S. Electromyographic Activity of Trunk Musculature During a Feldenkrais Awareness through Movement Lesson. Isokinetics and Exercise Science. 1(4): 216-221, 1991. 40. Ruth S, Kegerris S. Facilitating Cervical Flexion Using a Feldenkrais Method: Awareness Through Movement. J Sports Phys Ther.16(1): 25-29, 1992 41. Bruce, F.M. Making sense in movement
: the dynamics of self-learning and self-change. [Microform Thesis or Dissertation ] Kinesiology Publications,
University of Oregon Eugene, OR, 2004, 3 microfiche (234 fr.) 42. Nair DG, Fuchs A, Burkart S, Steinberg FL, Kelso JA. Assessing
recovery in middle cerebral artery stroke using functional MRI. Brain
Inj. 2005 Dec;19(13):1165-76. 43. Stephens J., Davidson
J., DeRosa J., Kriz M., Saltzman, N. Lengthening the Hamstring
Muscles Without Stretching
Using "Awareness Through
Movement". Phys Ther 2006 86: 1641-1650. VII. Theory: The question of theory has been addressed in each section of this paper. Buchanan (44) has written a useful summary of the application of Dynamic Systems Theory to the understanding of how FM may be working. Others have addressed the underlying ideas of learning and awareness more directly. (45, 46) As we continue to develop the research base of FM, we will continue to test the theoretical and practical ideas we have and refine and broaden the understanding and application of the process of FM that seems so powerful. 44. Buchanan PA. Ulrich
BD. The Feldenkrais Method: a dynamic approach to changing
motor behavior. [Review, Tutorial]
Research Quarterly for
Exercise & Sport. 72(4):315-23, 2001 Dec. 45. Shelhav-Silberbush, Chava. Movement and Learning: The Feldenkrais Method as a Learning Model. PhD Dissertation, Faculty of Sociology and Behavioral Science. Heidelberg University, Germany. 1998. Not yet reprinted or translated into English. Published in German. Controlled study with a group of learning disabled children in Germany 46. Vollmer, Fred. How do
I move my body? Journal Article] Journal of Mind & Behavior.
Vol 19(4) Fall 1998, 369-377. 47. Lewis JS, Kersten P, McCabe CS, McPherson KM, Blake DR. Body perception disturbance: A contribution to pain in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Pain. 2007 May 15; [Epub ahead of print] 48. Giummarra MJ, Gibson SJ, Georgiou-Karistianis N, Bradshaw JL. Central mechanisms in phantom limb perception: the past, present and future. Brain Res Rev. 2007 Apr;54(1):219-32. 49. Ann J. Individuals with dementia learn new habits and are empowered through the Feldenkrais method. [Journal Article, Case Study] Alzheimer's Care Quarterly. 2006 Oct-Dec; 7(4): 278-86. (29 ref) 50. Stergiou N, Harbourne R, Cavanaugh J. Optimal movement variability: a new theoretical perspective for neurologic physical therapy. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2006 Sep;30(3):120-9. 51. Buzzi UH, Stergiou N, Kurz MJ, Hageman PA, Heidel J. Nonlinear dynamics indicates aging affects variability during gait. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2003 Jun;18(5):435-43. 52. Staessen JA, Asmar R, De Buyzere M, Imai Y, Parati G, Shimada K, Stergiou G, Redon J, Verdecchia P; Participants of the 2001 Consensus Conference on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring. Task Force II: blood pressure measurement and cardiovascular outcome. Blood Press Monit. 2001 Dec;6(6):355-70. 53. Byrne JE, Stergiou N, Blanke D, Houser JJ, Kurz MJ, Hageman PA. Comparison of gait patterns between young and elderly women: an examination of coordination. Percept Mot Skills. 2002 Feb;94(1):265-80. 54. Bellec P, Perlbarg V, Jbabdi S, Pelegrini-Issac M, Anton JL, Doyon J, Benali H. Identification of large-scale networks in the brain using fMRI. Neuroimage. 2006 Feb 15;29(4):1231-43. Epub 2005 Oct 24. 55. Doyon J, Benali H. Reorganization
and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005 Apr;15(2):161-7.
Review. Jim Stephens PhD, PT, CFP
<< back
|
||||||